Posted by Heather on November 20, 2008

Rated R for pervasive drug use and language, strong violence, sexuality and nudity.
117 Minutes
Written and Directed By: Nick Cassavettes
You ever have that dream: the one where you did something… You don’t know why, but you can never go back? -Johnny Truelove
Synopsis
A young boy in the suburbs of LA is abducted by local drug dealers as ransom for his older brother who owes them a whopping $1200. Along the way it becomes clear these rookie criminals don’t know what their doing, and it becomes a dangerous road of whether their fear or common sense will prevail.
Review
There was no way I imagined this would be a good movie. With no question the film had it’s issues, but in general I found myself enjoying it’s over the top drama. This sensationalized story inspired by true events was much more than it promised in it’s previews. Ten minutes into the film it’s apparent there will be no Oscar performances and the story is going to cross into the land of fiction more often than not, but what is offered onscreen in those first few minutes is enough intrigue about the character’s and the promise of a story that will keep you entertained if not intellectually sustained.

The obvious holes in the story, and ignorance of it’s main character’s to their situation that leads to the finale don’t necessarily add up in a way that makes sense for any of the character arcs or the climax in general, and that’s where the film lacked the most. Suspension of disbelief only works if there is a remotely logical answer to the viewers questions and Alpha Dog ignored that at times. It was certainly melodramatic and could have done without the last fifteen minutes. It’s definitely on the softer side and often it fails simply because it tries to come off more abrasive than it truly is.
However, some of the twists and conflicts the story and character’s take begins to give the tale a bit more substance and suddenly it seems like Alpha Dog might actually be about more than young attractive actors glamming the silver screen up. What the film did was demand some respect, and attention from it’s viewer, and in general was a successful story that worked.
Cast
-
Bruce Willis as Sonny Truelove
-
Emilie Hirsch as Johnny Truelove
-
Justin Timberlake as Frankie Ballenbacher
-
Shawn Hatosy as Elvis Schmidt
-
Ben Foster as Jake Mazursky
-
Anton Yelchin as Zach Mazursky
-
Sharon Stone as Olivia Mazursky
-
Olivia Wilde as Angela Holden
-
Dominique Swain as Susan Ha
-
Chris Marquette as David Stratten
Where the film lacked in structure and general direction it made up for with a charismatic cast that often preoccupied the audiences mind and saved it from thinking too much. Hirsch was downright believable and kept his sidekick played by Timberlake grounded. The touching emotional scenes Timberlake was brilliant and natural. It was the in between moments that he felt awkward, but with some training and practice it’s something he can get past. Ben Foster is overwhelming in whatever he does, but it felt like Cassavettes literally took away the reins and let him go bonkers. At times I felt like he was trying to be too Ed Norton in American History X, but his twisted high pitched interpretation mostly made it his own. His behavior didn’t always make sense with the story, but it kept you entertained. Anton Yelchin was so sweet and adorable, I’d want to keep him as a pet too. By the end of the film he had me honestly concerned about him and his well being. The supporting ladies, including a small role by Sharon Stone, were great supporters, but there were so many and they all looked like carbon copies on one another. So much so, that I began to confuse them at points. Shawn Hatosy is a seasoned actor, and his veteran skills showed next to Timberlake again providing a strong counterpart to play off of. In the end each others weaknesses were upheld by each others strengths, and that’s good directing.
Ratings and Suggestions
With an attractive and charming cast this film will no doubt appeal to the teen crowd, but it does have something to offer an older, smarter audience as well. There is nothing profound about Alpha Dog, but it entails an engaging story about glamorous rich kids who do something very bad, and the choices they make thereafter. The performances are fun, and entertainment value on point. Alpha Dog was definitely more than it should have been, and is certainly worth checking out. Two and a half stars out of Four.
Posted in 2006, Drama, Suspense/Thriller | Tagged: Bruce Willis, Justin Timberlake, Anton Yelchin, Alpha Dog, Nick Cassavettes, Ben Foster, Emile Hirsch, Emilie Hirsch, Sharon Stone, Chris Marquette, Dominique Swain, Olivia Wilde, Shawn Hatosy | No Comments »
Posted by Heather on November 19, 2008
Rated PG-13 for intense sequences of violent action, a scene of torture, sexual content and nudity.
144 Minutes
Directed By: Martin Campbell
Written By: Neal Purvis and Robert Wade
The name’s Bond… James Bond. -James Bond
Synopsis
Bond returns with a new face and a new story, and after decades of gracing the big screen rewinds itself in history to the first mission of 007. His first mission is a game of gambling in more ways than one.
Review
The smooth and perfect Bond the world has grown accustomed to is now a bit altered on his first mission where errors and trouble are a muck. Our new Bond, played by Daniel Craig, no doubt is the same Bond we’ve watched years over, but certainly on the green side. The Bond we all know wouldn’t lose a fight, screw up, or be confused and caught by the bad guys, and if he would his escape and retreat would be so delicate it would see as though it were his plan in the first place anyway. But of course he had to start somewhere, and Casino Royale offers a trip to see where it all began for our favorite secret agent hero.
Bond of course never bumbles, but he does error in this film, and frankly it’s actually difficult to watch. He is still elegant as ever, not too mention arrogant, but to watch him fail makes this a very different Bond film. By the end of the movie you’ve found a resolve in his strength and why he is the Bond we know now.
With a different style, different script with a lot more depth, and a new Bond himself, Casino Royale often feels like the only characteristic its encompassed from Bond is the title character himself, and while this is not a negative thing, on first viewing it certainly does throw you, even if you expect it. Nonetheless, myself an avid aficionado of the Brosnan style Bonds, I found a relief in the fresh direction Casino Royale took and am more than perplexed to see where the next complicated Bond tale takes me.
Cast
- Daniel Craig as James Bond
- Eva Green as Vesper Lynd
- Mads Mikkelsen as Le Chiffre
- Judi Dench as M
- Jeffrey Wright as Felix Leiter
- Giancarlo Giannini as Mathis
Daniel Craig slips into the smooth shoes of the beloved Pierce Brosnan as our new Bond. With a different twist and different kind of Bond, but with the same underlying skills underneath, Craig takes the chance of becoming the Bond everyone would hate. However, his sarcastic smugness coupled with his tantalizing charm is impossible to not accept. He plays his role perfectly while still possessing the qualities of a Bond that the world has grown to adore and idolize. The Bond club is a very unique group that only a few have been part of and most are remembered solely for. Even Sean Connery with all his accomplishments and diverse roles over the years is often referred to as Bond. Hopefully in Quantum Of Solace Craig continues the brilliant commencement of his Bond career.
Ratings and Suggestions
I really enjoyed Casino Royale. In fact, I rank it as one of the best Bond films ever. The risks taken were well worth the result, and made a new cousin in the Bond family, that while related is certainly it’s own self. Reinventing is not an easy task, and even a greater one when the popular belief states the story is closer to what Ian Flemming’s original ideals about Bond should be. In every respect Casino Royale was a success. It’s plot and script was flawless and balanced it’s fantastical action with character’s to die for. Casino Royale earns my respect and three and a half stars.
Posted in 2006, Action | Tagged: 007, Action, Action-Adventure, Bond, Casino Royale, Daniel Craig, Eva Green, Giancarlo Giannini, Ian Flemming, James Bond, Jeffrey Wright, Judi Dench, M, Mads Mikkelsen, Martin Campbell, Movie, Neal Purvis, Pierce Brosnan, Robert Wade, Roger Moore, SAS, Sean Connery, Secret Agent, Suspense Thriller, Timothy Dalton | No Comments »
Posted by Heather on November 18, 2008

366 Minutes
Directed By: Mick Garris
Teleplay By: Stephen King
Based On The Novel By: Stephen King
M-O-O-N, that spells Tom Cullen. -Tom Cullen
Synopsis
Man has finally met his match. A super virus created by the military has wiped out the majority of the planet nearly ending in an extinction for man. The survivors have each found they share similar dreams. One that leads them to Nebraska to an elderly woman, and one that leads them to Las Vegas to a man who is ominous and terrifying. As the survivors pick sides reality shifts once again, and suddenly surviving isn’t enough. One side must prevail.
Review
Just like a Stephen King novel, a translated film, even miniseries like The Stand, ends up being pretty prolific. One of the things I admire about Stephen Kings storytelling is the need for the writer to really finish a story instead of leaving the unknown. When a tale is told, everything is told, and it feels like the story has really ended. There is a complete catharsis to finish his stories, and it was evident that he was responsible for the teleplay of The Stand as it omitted that same feeling of tying up all loose ends.
A magnificent tale of survival after a man made Apocalypse, a fear displayed again and again in film and novella, King manages to make his own twist on it that is very different than most stories. Death by virus is a simplistic method for extinction, but the supernatural and religious overtones that follow the cataclysmic end of man, really define what The Stand is about. There is no question the story began as child questioning the universe what the meaning of life is, good and evil, if God exists, and all the other profound questions one could surmise. It’s told in Kings simple way of letting a plethora of characters play out seemingly irrelevant events that lead to a masterful conclusion.
My one complaint about the tale had less to do with the story telling and more to do with the directorial position than anything. The first three parts were clearly started and finished but also contained a symmetry between them. They never felt like they were carrying on or going for too long. The fourth and final part felt very dragged out at times. Especially with the final mission which seemed created just for the sake of killing more people. Whatever the motivation, the result was a dragging that left the story feeling like it would never end.
Cast
-
Gary Sinise as Stu Redman
-
Rob Lowe as Nick Andros
-
Molly Ringwald as Frannie Goldsmith
-
Jamey Sheridan as Randall Flagg
-
Ruby Dee as Mother Abigail
-
Laura San Giacomo as Nadine Cross
-
Corin Nemec as Harold Lauder
-
Ossie Davis as Judge Richard Farris
-
Miguel Ferrer as Lloyd Henreid
-
Matt Frewer as Trashcan Man
-
Adam Storke as Larry Underwood
-
Ray Walston as Glen Batemen
-
Bill Fagerbakke as Tom Cullen
The cast was fully loaded and to no surprise, each actor, on the good and evil side added something special to the survivors of earth and each actor really displayed the understanding that surviving wasn’t enough. Jamey Sheridan, Bill Fagerbakke, and Gary Sinise were the stand out performances, but everyone else played very well to the typical Stephen King ensemble cast, other than Molly Ringwald. In the past twenty years she continues to prove she has no acting talent and that her career as an eighties teen princess should be left in the eighties with Tiffany and Debbie Gibson’s music. She was an annoying thorn in the side of the movie, but only that, not enough to ruin it.
Ratings and Suggestions
It took me nearly fourteen years to finally sit down and make a marathon of The Stand, but it was well worth the wait. I’m not sure it’s the kind of movie I want to revisit, but I’m definitely implored to read the book. This, more than many of Kings supernatural tales, really seemed to get under my skin and be entertained at the same time. It’s a balance he generally plays well. I think everyone should take a viewing of this movie eventually. It would be worth your while. This quote from the film seemed to sum up the theme best:
You’re quite a piece of work Mr Cockroach. We could learn a lesson from you, especially in light of recent events. I have an idea come this time tomorrow I’ll be gone, but you’ll still be trucking, running little roach errands. -Glen Batemen
Posted in 1993, Horror, Science Fiction | Tagged: Horror, Stephen King, Rob Lowe, The Stand, 1993 Miniseries, Mick Garris, Tom Cullen, Gary Sinise, Molly Ringwald, Ruby Dee, Jamey Sheridan, Laura San Giacomo, Corin Nemec, Ossie Davis, Miguel Ferrer, Matt Frewer, Adam Storke, Ray Walston, Bill Fagerbakke, Tiffany, Debbie Gibson, Made for tv film | 1 Comment »
Posted by Heather on October 27, 2008

Rated R for violence and demonic images.
121 Minutes
Directed By: Francis Lawrence
Written BY: Jamie Delano and Garth Ennis
Angels and Demons can’t cross over onto our plane. So, instead we get what I call half-breeds. The influence peddlers. They can only whisper in our ears. But a single word can give you courage, or turn your favorite pleasure into your worst nightmare. Those with the demon’s touch like those part angel, living alongside us. They call it the balance. I call it hypocritical bullshit. -John Constantine
Synopsis
Based on the DC/Vertigo comic book Hellblazer and written by Kevin Brodbin, Mark Bomback and Frank Capello, Constantine tells the story of supernatural detective John Constantine, who has literally been to hell and back in this highly stylized action-thriller. In a routine exorcism Constantine sees something that tells him some much larger evil is awry, and suddenly the rules and laws of good and evil and being smashed around him. He must make the right choices to avenge his own soul and save mankind.
Review
Keanu Reeves makes a brilliant choice and ops for a darker fantasy film that essentially deals with Satan and God once again. Not unlike The Devils Advocate this film focuses more on the dark side of our existence rather than the light, but these two films similarities end there. The setting for Constantine has a realistic feel, that’s ominous receptivity is more than palpable. Together it combines the supernatural, it’s comic book roots, and a suspenseful thriller that embodies some of the most frightening questions and fears about the battle between light and dark.

The plot is laid out in a natural and descriptive manner that allows the viewer to connect and learn about the main players, while still getting a good picture of the playing field below. Rules are set, and some are inevitably obvious they will be broken. The story balances educating it’s viewer with information, while simultaneously remaining mysterious and aloof. This preternatural story has the foreboding of Rosemary’s Baby while having the menacing excitement of Poltergeist. It is truly of the greater supernatural stories created in recent days and has the lasting power to be named with other classic titles for years to come.
The small innuendos and subtle clues that connect the mystery to one giant finale evokes our own superstitions or beliefs with a powerful plot line that is full of raw emotion, personal triumphs and crashes for our main character’s, and a desperation for answers that mirrors reality so clearly that it’s obvious nature plays out perfectly as a fictional undertone.
It’s highly distinct visuals are enamoring on their own. Each main character has a superhero/villain appearance that isn’t over the top enough to not fit in with day to day society, but it is enough to remove them as something different and more special, which is an utterly brilliant physical metaphor for the character’s existences. The tone the colors and the manner in which the film is captured on camera touch reality, but really omit the feeling of stepping into a different side of reality that seems identical to our own, but is entirely more sinister.
Cast
-
Keanu Reeves as Constantine
-
Rachel Weisz as Angela Dodson/Isabel Dodson
-
Tilda Swanson as Gabriel
-
Shia LaBeouf as Chas Kramer
-
Djimon Hounsou as Midnite
-
Max Baker as Beeman
-
Gavin Rossdale as Balthazar
-
Peter Stormare as Satan
The cast delivered the stories message so clearly it seemed the roles were actually written for each member. This is the kind of rule that suits Keanu Reeves. It’s dark, detached, and strong, but doesn’t require a stretch of emotions for him. His counter-part Rachel Weisz was utterly marvelous. Her presence is unyielding and yet remains quietly insinuated. It’s always there, and her performance in this film made all of the high struck emotions something the viewer could really feel. The supporting actors, including Tilda Swanson in one of her first American roles, was a breath taking scene stealer. From the moment she garnered the focus of the camera till moments after it left her, the intensity of the movie was suddenly heightened. She is one of the best actresses available today and her making such a small, yet important, role so dynamic and huge, was a remarkable display of her talent, and it gave so much more to an already exciting film. Other supporters including Shia LaBeouf, Djimon Hounsou, Peter Stormare, and Gavin Rossdale were excellent additions, really pulling together outside characters and making them feel fleshed out and three dimensional.
Ratings and Suggestions
Constantine is one of my favorite films in this genre and as I’ve mentioned I believe has the ability to last threw the times as a classic in it’s category. It captured all the positive aspects of a supernatural story, the visual landscape of a comic, the timing of a great suspense thriller, and characters that were captivating and mysterious. Even though the conclusion of the story gives you answers and closure, it feels like the characters continue to live on in their twisted and demented world that seems to coincide with our own. This is a movie for an adult audience that isn’t afraid to let their imagination be whisked away by darkness. Absolutely brilliant. Four Stars.
Posted in 2005, Fantasy, Suspense/Thriller | Tagged: Keanu Reeves, Satan, Shia LaBeouf, Peter Stormare, DC Comics, Rachel Weisz, Constantine, John Constantine, God, Gavin Rossdale, Balthazar, Max Baker, Beeman, Djimon Hounsou, Midnite, Chas Kramer, Tilda Swanson, Gabriel, Angela Dodson, Isabel Dodson, Son Of Satan, Hellblazer, Kevin Brodbin, Mark Bomback, Frank Capello, Jamie Delano, Garth Ennis, Francis Lawrence | No Comments »
Posted by Heather on October 8, 2008

Rated PG-13 for intense action violence.
101 Minutes
Directed By: Rob Bowman
Written By: Gregg Chabot and Kevin Peterka
Envy the country that has heroes, huh? I say pity the country that needs them. -Denton Van Zan
Synopsis
Something has been sleeping and mans curiosity has awakened a living nightmare. What was once only believed to be a myth soon became all too real, and unfortunately before the whole world would accept it’s truth it had let too many roam free and destroy mankind. Our weapons were no match, and soon the world became little more than a pile of ash as Dragons combed the streets in starvation helping bring another species to extinction.
Review
Dragons, Post-Apocalyptic world, Christian Bale, Matthew McConaughey as a rogue dragon slayer and cool special effects? What more could you ask for. Reign of Fire had the goods and delivered them in a dark mystic way that both science fiction junkies and any action flick aficionado would appreciate. It is a roller coaster ride of emotions and fear of an impending doom for the race of man. With a future of either the dragons or man out-surviving each other, it seems man must all but give up, but Reign of Fire shows mans relentless instinct for survival, but also mans enigmatic knack for conquering it’s oppressors.
Directer Rob Bowman did an excellent job of balancing characters, the story, and the action without delving too deep into either counterpart. Each was given back round enough to be plausible and three dimensional, but none were over focused on, which left a mystery about the characters, the dragons even, the history of how the world fully came to be, and just enough special effects and action to wet your mouth with, but the cup never ran over. Less is often more, and Bowman really put that theory to work and made it succeed in this ravishing tale, that very much so stands on it’s own versus others that may dabble in this genre.
Cast
Christian Bale is with no question one of the best leading men available today, and definitely a great lead for action films, but in this tale of death and destruction, Matthew McConaughey steals the screen with his bravado and machismo playing Denton Van Zan, a Dragon Slaying maniac, that is in my opinion McConaughey’s best role to date. McConaughey breathes charisma and demands the camera’s attention each time his is on screen, and even when he isn’t, his depiction is so powerful you yearn for him to return. Van Zan is one of the most magnetic characters ever in a Science Fiction film. The reviting performances by both lead men carry the film effectively and with their own distinct style and flair.
Ratings and Suggestions
This is a powerhouse film that really emotes the instinct for human survival but also the desire for something beyond just existing. It’s subtle way of justifying this concept with an effortless plot that ignites a response from the viewer while simultaneously being entertained. That’s just plain good fantasy and Sci-Fi. Reign of Fire certainly rose above and beyond my expectations and goes down as one of my favorite post-apocalyptic tales of all time with the unchallenged balance of entertainment, suspense, driven and compelling characters and a depth that went beyond superficial fun. Reign of Fire is a pure and simple joyride of suspense and pleasure. It wins an easy three and a half stars from me.
Posted in 2002, Action, Fantasy, Science Fiction, Suspense/Thriller | Tagged: Gerard Butler, Science Fiction, Action, Christian Bale, Matthew McConaughey, Fantasy, Reign OF Fire, Dragons, Izabella Scorupco, Denton Van Zan, Rob Bowman, Gregg Chabot, Kevin Peterka | 1 Comment »
Posted by Heather on October 2, 2008

Rated PG-13 for intense battle sequences.
127 Minutes
Written By: Doug Taylor and Jason Rappaport
Directed By: Uwe Boll
I will have my vengeance. -Farmer
Synopsis
An evil medieval magician/warlord uses magic to seduce a rival sorcerers daughter, steal her powers and run an army of drone killers to take over the land, yet there is one who would stop him from achieving his goal. A mere farmer, who seems much more, desires to avenge the death of his son, and save his wife who has been taken prisoner. Everything is mystical and full of illusions.
Review
How does Uwe manage to get a decent cast list when he makes movies that qualify Sci-Fi originals as Oscar worthy in comparison? Beyond the cast, what I have been subject to has been a frightening display of inept unoriginal thinking and execution. In The Name Of The King is the crown jewel of his film failures and should be red taped at every video store it’s available at.
There were no high expectations here either. Just an innocent curiosity about Jason Statums new adventure flick that’s supporting cast offered the possibility of something bigger than those Sci-Fi Originals though obviously I wasn’t hoping for Lord Of The Rings. Sure, mindless adventure with battles and over the top love heroics were something forecast, but the result was a film shot in an almost hazy fashion with sloppy battle sequences that even the action hero Jason Statam couldn’t overcome. The script itself felt lazy and bored. It was as though the writers were too busy playing X-box to write anything original at all. The pathetic story they put together was stolen ideas from video games and movies already created alike, and it’s visual creation less exciting than soggy oatmeal.
It was truly an atrocity, with drone villains, and the heroes, in particular the history of “Farmer” simply ludicrous. It was exasperating to sit through, but somehow I managed my way threw it’s entirety. I suspect it was the masochist in me, but I felt I needed to know exactly how this stupid and annoying tale finished itself. And after the sacrifice of nearly every main character, the ending just left me wanting more massacre, in the hopes that every character would die so there would be no possibility for a sequel.
Cast
-
Jason Statam as Farmer
-
Ray Liotta as Gallian
-
Claire Forlani as Solana
-
John Rhyes-Davies as Merik
-
Matthew Lillard as Duke Fallow
-
LeeLee Sobieski as Muriella
-
Burt Reynolds as King Konreid
-
Ron Perlman as Norick
Jason Statam is a decent actor, but his abilities were far too limited to rise above the quality of film and script involved. Even Burt Reynolds and John Ryes-Davies came off looking like morons. The only character that seemed to fall comfortably into the story was Ron Perlmans, and his role was too small to have contributed anything in the long run. Ray Liotta was the absolute worst though. He incorporated everything that was wrong about the movie as he portrayed an evil sorcerer that managed to come off as more of a Gangster gone Child molester. His character was creepy in all the wrong ways and made the story that much more laughable until you come to realize that Matthew Lillard is actually playing a power hungry villain, and then suddenly you begin to ask yourself why exactly you’re still watching and if you’ve misread the label as parody? Well, it’s not and other than some twisted desire to finish the nightmare of a film, there is truly no reason to watch it. There is also no redemption for the actors who chose to be a part of this twisted story, as the script was obviously a complete disaster. They all deserve the fate of being part of one of the worst movies ever.
Ratings and Suggestions
I don’t know what it’s rated, but the only suggestion I have for this terrible flick is to STAY AWAY, STAY FAR AWAY! This is time you can never get back, but the most unfortunate aspect of the movie is it doesn’t leave you after you’re done viewing. You can’t seem to get it’s utter stupidity out of your mind. This movie is easily a candidate for worst movie of the year and possibly all time. Don’t watch it ever. I promise you won’t be sorry. No stars for In The Name Of The King: A Dungeon Tale and shame on you Uwe Boll for making it.
Posted in 2007, Action | Tagged: A Dungeon Tale, Action-Adventure, Burt Reynolds, Claire Forlani, Doug Taylor, Fantasy, In The Name Of The King, Jason Rappaport, Jason Statum, John Rhyes-Davies, LeeLee Sobieski, Matthew Lillard, Ray Liotta, Ron Perlman, Uwe Boll | No Comments »
Posted by Heather on September 30, 2008

Rated PG-13 for sequences of intense violence and action, some disturbing images and brief strong language.
90 Minutes
Directed By: Pete Travis
Written By: Barry Levy
Control is compromised! -Thomas Barnes
Synopsis
The President Of The United States is shot while giving a speech in a hostile country and is killed, or is he? Who did it, and why? The answers are available threw the vision of just a few people that happened to be in the crowd that day. What will they unveil and what will the truth reveal?
Review
This off balance flick had a great, original premise with what seemed to promise a non-stop adrenaline rush. Unfortunately, Vantage Points previews were much better than the film itself. While undoubtedly entertaining, and always perking a constant interest, it’s switching from view to view, and character to character succeeded in being coherent, but failed in it’s building climax and it’s ability to make any real connection to the characters. Even Dennis Quaid as the Secret Service man Barnes, who was obviously structured to be the nucleus on the story, seemed to fall short of ever developing at all. The problem with this was, the movie relied on it’s need for character structure instead of relying on the story itself or the events that were occurring. The made the film disorienting and gave it a feel of not being complete. The end should have brought a round about catharsis and feeling of closure, but instead felt unfulfilled.
Though the execution of this idea was not done to it’s ability, the story itself, especially in the first twenty minutes or so, was very gripping and interesting. The unknowing of how each characters perspective played a part in the events that transpired seemed very important, and you as a viewer seemed to be part of the mystery as you were viewing exactly what the characters were. Unfortunately, that delicate connection was severed when the character’s each developed some personal back round and became very involved in the story and it shifted from something original into something banal and done many times over in the past.
It was unfortunate that the film unfolded as it did, and disappointed as it did. It seemed as though it were two movies cut in half that were distant cousins of each other that met up at a family reunion for a night. The confusion of it’s creation left for a dismal climax that’s anticipation way over trumped any possibility of desire to view again.
Cast
- Dennis Quaid as Barnes
- Sigourney Weaver as Rex Brooks
- Matthew Fox as Kent Taylor
- Forrest Whitaker as Howard Lewis
- William Hurt as President Ashton
- Edgar Ramirez as Javier
- Bruce McGill as Phil McCullough
- Said Taghmaoui as Suarez
- Zoe Saldana as Angie Jones
- Enduardo Noriega as Enrique
- Richard T. Jones as Holden
The cast was intriguing. Of course I believe Sigourney Weaver should be in every film ever made since she is my favorite actress, and her short part in the movie left me wanting to see more of her on screen than some of the other characters. Her subtle depiction was what the rest of the film lacked. She was easiest to connect with in the superficial way the rest of the film should have followed with it’s different “vantage points”. Forrest Whitaker and Dennis Quaid are generally good in anything they do. Honestly, they could be doing an infomerical about play-doe and I’d be interested, but even their strength in acting couldn’t distract from the annoyance of the distorted movie that strived to be too much. The rest of the cast was just as interesting and acted just as well. Unfortunately, it was out of their hands, as the finished product was just too much.
Ratings and Suggestions
Though Vantage Point was entirely overambitious, and failed in what it’s previews and first portion of the movie itself promised, it was at least entertaining at its worst, and if it had simplified it’s plot and stopped trying to be something it wasn’t it had the ability to be a great success. The disappoint of it’s mediocre execution was actually worse than the film itself. This movie is worth a rental if your expectations aren’t too high, but if they are, I think a viewing on cable is more reasonable. In the end Vantage Point was just Ok. Two out of Four stars.
Posted in 2008, Suspense/Thriller | Tagged: Barry Levy, Bruce McGill, Dennis Quaid, Edgar Ramirez, Eduardo Noriega, Forrest Whitaker, Matthew Fox, Movie, Movie Review, Pete Travis, Richard T. Jones, Sigourney Weaver, Suspense Thriller, Vantage Point, William Hurt, Zoe Saldana | 1 Comment »
Posted by Heather on August 5, 2008
Directed By: Martin Wood
Written By: Brad Wright and Jonathon Glassner
That is why we’ve come all this way. Why we had to endure all that singing. Get rid of the last bad guy, then there’s…cake. -General Jack O’Neill
Synopsis
After Teal’c and Vala vanish during Baal’s execution ceremony, SG-1 gates back to Earth to discover that the timeline has been altered and the Stargate program no longer exists.
Review
Stargate Continuum was another success from my point of view in the Stargate DVD movie collection verse. That being said, I’m going to get my major criticism immediately out of the way. The Ark Of Truth did an excellent job closing up SG-1’s tenth season cliffhangers, but also evolving it on a much larger scale than a regular two part episode, but as BIG as Martin Wood promised Continuum to be, it simply wasn’t. It had all the feeling and best elements of a season three or four finale episode but it never translated into feature film epic. This is not an out and out complaint, but it was a little bit dejecting because it was built up so much by the director, producers, and Stargate community. That icky little criticism aside Continuum made for an nostalgic return to days of early SG-1.

Some of the most perplexing SG-1 episodes and years involved the paradox of time travel and the most fun villain ever on the show: Ba’al. Continuum took our favorite big bad and made him alter time, by returning to the past to make sure the Stargate program never began. I believe it was Season 8 where that future also happened and Oneill, Teal’C, Daniel Jackson, and Carter had been stuck back when “Ra” had enslaved humanity. A different version of SG-1 returned to help adjust what went wrong over those years. This similar concept but told in another way is what Continuum offered. No matter how many times Stargate touches on the complexities and possible universes from the time travel department, the possibilities leave an endless array of conceivable altered futures and pasts. Even when the ending is often predictable, it’s this comfort that makes the far fetched existences and plots that much more fun.
Who can complain if SG-1 is involved? No matter what they do together it’s the chemistry that the original four began that carried the show into the most successful science fiction series ever on television. Even with the replacement of O’Neill with Ben Browder and the addition of the quirky Vala the essence of the show remained and it was and still is why it’s success is continually complimented.
Cast
-
Richard Dean Anderson as General Jack O’Neill
-
Amanda Tapping as Colonel Samantha Carter
-
Ben Browder as Colonel Cameron Mitchell
-
Christopher Judge as Teal’C
-
Michael Shanks as Dr. Daniel Jackson
-
Beau Bridges as General Hank Landry
-
Don S. Davis as General George Hammond
-
Claudia Black as Vala Mal Doran/Qetesh
-
William Devane as President Henry Hayes
-
Cliff Simon as Ba’al
-
Dan Shea as Sgt. Siler

The appearance by Richard Dean Anderson and the mutual disdain his character O’Neill and Ba’al, played by the brilliant Cliff Simon, have for one another had the exact same tension and charisma as it did in the many seasons before it. With a familiar storyline and the character of O’Neill actually being tangible rather than just periodically mentioned was a wonderful addition to the story, giving it the same fun bravado RDA carried for so many seasons. Don S. Davis also returned to give the story the old feel of SG-1, but was also bittersweet knowing it was his last performance as General Hammond as he passed away recently. Hammond of Texas will forever be missed. Vala and Teal’C disappearing and playing very different roles as their futures were altered made it fun to watch them a little bit different. The remaining triangle of Carter, Mitchell, and Daniel Jackson became the heart and thrust of the story and our main character’s did not let us down to for a second. It’s truly a wonderful cast.
Ratings and Suggestions
This one just as much so as Ark Of Truth is more geared towards committed fans of the show rather than making the attempt to recruit new viewers. That being said you wouldn’t have to had watched the entire series to “get” Continuum, but to appreciate it for what it was, you would. It was a little bit of a let down for me in some ways, but also a comforting piece of SG-1 nostalgia in another respect as it followed the same great elements of some of the original seasons. It again let’s me hope that this isn’t the end of SG-1 movies entirely, but one never knows. Either way Continuum was a fun addition to one of my favorite science fiction universes. Three out of Four Stars.
Posted in 2008, Science Fiction | Tagged: Amanda Tapping, Ben Browder, Beau Bridges, Teal'C, Christopher Judge, Stargate, SG-1, General Hank Landry, Claudia Black, Vala Mal Doran, Brad Wright, Robert C. Cooper, Achilles, General Jack O'Neill, Colonel Carter, Daniel Jackson, Stargate Continuum, Ba'al, General George Hammond, Hammond Of Texas, Michael Shanks, Don S. Davis, Qetesh, Colonel Cameron Mitchell, Richard Dean Anderson, Martin Wood, Gateworld, Continuum, Time Travel, Cliff Simon, Dan Shea, Sgt. Siler, William Devane, President Henry hayes, Stargate Command, Ga'ould, Jaffa | No Comments »
Posted by Heather on August 1, 2008

Rated PG-13 for sequences of intense action and violence.
109 Minutes
Directed By: Roland Emmerich
Written by: Roland Emmerich and Harold Kloser
[speaking to the spear-tooth] You must remember me. I gave you life. -D’Leh
Synopsis
Prehistoric man’s love is taken to be a slave for crazy Pharaoh in far off land. Prehistoric man searches for woman and fights great battles and prehistoric foes. There is lots of CGI and little dialogue. There is almost a battle at the end.
Review
I tried to write a synopsis but the smart part of my brain couldn’t say much more than a sentence or two because that was all I could muster without criticizing any aspect of it. What I expect from a Roland Emmerich film is very little. I wager there will be superficial character’s with a paper thin plot and mediocre dialogue that will offer an occasional laugh if delivered by a good enough actor. Most importantly there is excellent CGI and action sequences to distract from the simplistic story being told before you. Emmerich is one of the few directors who can pull this off and generally come up with a reasonable movie that’s harmless enough to not mind that it’s kind of dumb.
10,00 b.c. did not offer that kind of pay-off. It failed miserably at every attempt to make anything that resembled a successful movie, action story, epic adventure, or even *holds breath* good CGI. It was BORING. An hour and a half of nonsense. I literally fell asleep twice and this was after a cup of coffee. The character’s are tedious and without any charismatic salvation. The lead actors best quality he can offer is nice abs and a handsome face. The journey is witless and without any anticipation to where the finale takes place. Once the great pyramid was unveiled it was such a let down nothing after it hardly mattered. The villains were not frightening and nor was the end result at all consequential to the tale being told.
The most disappointing aspect was the CGI. I had HUGE expectations here, and while some of the shots were pretty amazing, in general I felt like what I watched was separate from the actors in the story. Movies like Lord Of The Rings and the Weta team mastered the ability to take a fantasy or unknown world and make it feel real, like it was a possible existence in some universe. While this movie was a historic proven existence at one time, the shots, the land and the collaboration of it all came together as a movie set rather than a real world.
Ratings And Suggestions
I pretty much liked nothing about 10,000 b.c. and am thankful I didn’t spend $10 at the movie theatre like I had initially planned because the trailers made it seem so epic and fun. It was epic already, it was a better parody of epic movies than “Epic Movie” actually was. I actually feel dumber for having watched it. I give it a half star out of four based on the cool Woolly Mammoths and the fact that Witless Protection still was a worse movie than this. But that’s it.
Posted in 2008, Action | Tagged: 000 B.C., 10, 10000 B.C., Action-Adventure, CGI, Epic Movie, Lord Of The Rings, Pharaoh, Prehistoric man, Roland Emmerich, Sabor Tooth Tiger, Weta, Witless Protection, Woolly Mammoth | No Comments »
Posted by Heather on July 31, 2008

Rated PG-13 for sexual content, including some frank dialogue, language and smoking.
112 Minutes
Directed and Written By: Adam Brooks
I had two serious girlfriends… and then some other smattering of other women. -Will Hayes
Synopsis
A young girls parents are getting divorced and she doesn’t comprehend why. In a desperate attempt to explain exactly how complex relationships and love truly are, and how timing is everything, her father tells her the story of how he met her mother without letting his daughter know which woman in the story was her mother. The “love mystery” begins.
Review
It was a breath of fresh air to watch a film about relationships and life that wasn’t all about corny predictably romantic beats and happy endings. It was a realistic journey threw the eyes of a man who’s life had changed drastically from his hopes and dreams leaving college with a collage of failed relationships. His divorce and his daughter caught in the middle is the driving force for this reflective peek into what once was and what was lost over the years. While some of memories are borderline dark and depressing the story itself manages to keep an upbeat positive feel that often offers a good chuckle in between romance and heartbreaks, without being awkward or forced, like a lot of films in this genre.

Another aspect of this story and characterizations that stood apart from movies of this kind was the main male role wasn’t emasculated into some wimpy guy searching for his feelings. His most gut wrenching moments had more to do with his relationship with his daughter than anything. It was touching in a way that was authentic and genuine.
It was also touched on, though not thoroughly explored, the dreams when you are young, of what you think life will be like, and how not just romance, but how work, politics’s, other choices change your point of view on life with time. Life and it’s disappoints turns people into cynics and often inspires us to travel down paths we had never imagined traveling down, but what Definitely, Maybe offers is the idea that not all dreams have to be lost, even after life has changed drastically. It’s never too late to try.
Cast
- Ryan Reynolds as William Hayes
- Abigail Breslin as Maya Hayes
- Elizabeth Banks as Emily
- Rachel Weisz as Summer Hartley
- Kevin Kline as Hampton Roth
- Isla Fisher as April Hoffman
In spite of myself I am really beginning to enjoy Ryan Reynolds and appreciate the fact that he isn’t just a pretty face, though his face is exquisite. He seems to get a real feel for his roles and bring them to life. His interpretation of William Hayes is no exception. His charisma and the inert sweetness, yet still masculine man trying to explain love and heartbreak to his young daughter was both believable and entertaining. The supporting ladies were all fantastic, though Elizabeth Banks felt a little dry at times, they pulled his love interests off very well. Kevin Kline played a small role but it was one of the shining moments of the film. His enigmatic portrayal of Hampton Roth, the drunk intellect, was provocative and humorous.
Ratings And Suggestions
I am not a fan of the kind of movie people refer to as “chick flicks”, and though Definitely, Maybe has the qualities to suffer that pigeon holing it is truly something more. It is a movie about relationships and what happens after those happily ever after kisses at the end of romance movies. It was enjoyable to see someone take a realistic perspective on a topic rarely addressed in theaters today and turn it into a movie that was delightful in it’s honesty, but also offering a sweet love story in the middle. I recommend this movie to anyone who has been in a relationship, been in love, or had their heartbroken. It will bring tears to your eyes at moments and it will also make you laugh. This was a wonderful surprise. 3.5 out of 4 stars.
Posted in 2008, Comedy, Drama, Romance | Tagged: Abigail Breslin, Adam Brooks, Chick Flick, Definitely, Drama, Elizabeth Banks, Isla Fisher, Kevin Kline, Knotting Hill, Love Actually, Maybe, Movie Review, Rachel Weisz, Romance, Romantic Comedy, Ryan Reynolds | 2 Comments »