14 Responses to “Avatar (2009)”

  1. Castor says:

    Good review Heather. You do gush about the movie but it’s refreshing to see someone actually try to look past the few weaknesses the movie has. Reviewing movies does get us to look for weaknesses and maybe enjoy some movies a little less than we should

    Reply
  2. Andy says:

    Whist I don’t disagree with anything you say completely I found the films problems greater than you did. I may have been a little harsh on the film in my review because of the circumstances in which I wrote it. I got home from the cinema (Pizza and a glass of Shiraz in hand) and tuned on my computer and my TV. Aliens was just starting. I wouldn’t normally have watched it, I have the DVD and saw it a couple of months ago. I left it on in the background as I typed away. The problem was I was so distracted by the masterpiece on the TV I gave up on the review until the movie had finished. Aliens is film making perfection. I can think of no way the film could have been made better, and we have to remember the film is a sequel and parts of it are constrained by the original film. Avatar is a good film, it is just not a great one it just relies to much of the amazing visuals and the emotive subject and for that reason it will suffer on future viewings and with age for that reason I have to disagree the film is not a masterpiece but I enjoyed it and I think most people who see it will also enjoy it and that is what movies are really about, entertaining us!

    Reply
  3. Trapped in Philly says:

    I have a real problem with using Aliens as the prime comparison to Avatar. They aren’t meant to be the same film. Aliens is intentionally darker, and more focused on dialog. Avatar is a character driven film, meant to inspire your connection to an unlikely set of protagonists. While I cannot argue against the notion that Avatar is driven by “Amazing visuals and the emotive subject”, why can’t be enough? I was so drawn in by this story that I almost cried and screamed out loud in glee several times. I haven’t been this engaged by a movie in theater since Independance Day.

    Remember, movies don’t have to be intellectual epics. They can inspire your emotions and still be brilliant. I feel sorry for people who can’t be inspired emotionally by films like Avatar.

    Reply
    • Heather says:

      Independence Day is not the best movie ever by any means, but I gave it a four star rating as well because I remember the excitement and enthusiasm in the theatre watching it. It was more than just an action/sci-fi flick. It was an experience.

      I feel like when we are criticizing movies we forget to just enjoy them sometimes. Some movies are more than just attempts at perfection, they are stories being told. Look at the original series of SW? Is that perfect movie making? Not even close. The greatest Jedi in the universe is a whinny brat from Tatooine while his Daddy is force choking people who disagree with anything they say. It’s not scripture, it’s not Anne Rice, it’s not Shakespeare. It is great because it is, what it is. So Philly, I’m with coming with you and the fish on this one.

      Reply
  4. Andy says:

    Trapped in Philly: I am not making a direct comparison between the two films or suggesting that they are any way similar. I am just saying that in my opinion one of them is a great film that will stand up as such in years to come and the other one will not! The fact that I hated Independence Day suggests we have very different taste in movies. I don’t expect all movies to be intellectual epics, I haven’t finalised it yet but expect Inglourious Basterds, Zombieland and Drag Me to Hell to make my top ten movies of 2009. None of these are intellectual epics!

    Reply
    • Heather says:

      Zombieland and Inglourious Basterds will be rounding out my top list as well. :)

      Reply
  5. Trapped in Philly says:

    Basterds is my number one for the year, based on rewatchability. *Spoiler Alert*

    The reason I used Independence Day is it shares a populist theme that is specifically written to create emotional conntection and release with the audience, just like Avatar was. However, I-Day uses “cheap heat” to get the connection. The pro-USA, gunslinging type action draws in the average viewer without any real substance behind it. Avatar was the masterpiece of this type of populist action film. At the end of the first hour, the Na’vi are still just savages, who seem to act without logic in their interaction with the humans. If you would have told me at this point of the movie I would be literally cheering out loud for Na’Vi in the final battle (along with the majority of my fellow audience) I would have slapped you twice and called you a liar. The connections were built through character development that created real connections. What made Avatar so brilliant is the work done to create the attachment, and that this is a Cameron film so we didn’t know the outcome. I expected Neytiri to die when she was pinned down. I expected the Tree of Life to be damaged or destroyed by the bombing run. So the relief, and excitement, when things went right was real and expressed by the audience.

    I-Day will always mean something to me because the theater experience on the Tuesday it was released was so unique. People were cheering, clapping, giving out high fives. It left a very lasting and vivid memory. Avatar was the only movie since that has given me the same audience experience and I promise an equally powerful memory will remain.

    Reply
  6. Andy says:

    Heather, glad to see Zombieland making someone else’s list too. Our top tens will differ though because three or four of my choices came out in 2008 for you!

    Trapped in Philly: I sat through independence day thinking this is cheesy crap, its only redeeming thing was Will Smith who played it for laughs.

    Reply
    • Heather says:

      That is right! Aren’t you from Australia or something of the like?

      I will be curious to see your list. Mine will be posted right before the New Year I think. I’m almost done with the top fifty of the decade. It’s so difficult.

      Reply
  7. If you see it more than once, you catch more of the great hints and one-liners (although the only reason I saw it again was b/c I wanted to watch it in a better theatre)- like when Sigourney Weaver talks about the Tree of Souls for the first time and says, “I’d die for some samples.” Nice one, Cameron.

    I know exactly what you mean about the time thing! It was two hours in and I was like “this better not be the fucking ending! Oh good, there’s another hour.” Normally in a three hour long movie you’re like “WHY WON’T THIS END??”

    Quoting someone who posted a comment on my blog, this was a serious, explosionary version of Fern Gully. But it was also brilliant and awesome. Thanks for the review.

    Reply
    • Heather says:

      You are welcome Mistress. I figured it’s magic would wear off after nearly two weeks after seeing it but I seriously just want to see it again.

      Reply
  8. dsi r4 says:

    Hi,
    Avtar movie was really nice i like it’s special effects…It’s rarely less than absorbing and never boring over its nearly three-hour length.

    Reply
  9. I don’t understand the arguing about this movie. It feels like Titanic all over again. It was technically amazing and part of those special effects made it so great. If the story had been more complex it would have taken away from the beauty of the film and wasn’t that the point? This is James Cameron, not Michael Bay. There was a lot more depth than there wasn’t. I am confused by the controversy. It’s seems it’s more of an argument for the sake of argument. Most critics and most people really did LOVE it, myself included.

    Reply
  10. I like the Avatar 3D film, particularly the story line, not only it brings a very new feelings however inspiring ideas of humanity. I heard the New Avatar 2 is comming soon, can’t wait to see it again…!

    Reply