8 Responses to “Inglorious Basterds (2009) – Jim’s Take”

  1. moviejunkie says:

    “Many people claim that his films have too much dialogue, are foul and excessively violent. These are the exact reasons that I love them.”

    Well said, well said! I couldn’t agree more!

    Reply
  2. Heather says:

    I think hands down this was the best movie of 2009 so far. Your review definitely got it right Jim!

    Reply
  3. brad says:

    i liked this movie pretty good and i don’t usually like war movies unless they are all epic style but then this didn’t feel like a war movie. the ending was the best part.

    Reply
  4. hagiblog says:

    My girlfriend doesn’t really want to watch this because films about Nazi’s bother her. I really liked it and I might have to agree with it being one of the best Tarantino films I’ve seen. I also agree that there should have been more with the Basterds but Christoph Waltz was a great distraction when the Basterds weren’t on screen.

    Reply
  5. I’m not ashamed to say that I’m ass over teacups in love with Col. Hans Landa in this movie, who is hands-down one of the best movie villains ever. That aside, there are scores of other things I love about “Inglourious Basterds”: the music, the acting (Melanie Laurent, Brad Pitt and Eli Roth are GREAT), the film’s disjointed structure and, naturally, all the little Tarantino trademarks sprinkled throughout. This is easily one of QT’s best, and possibly might top “Reservoir Dogs” for me.

    Reply
    • Jim says:

      I think that his devilish smile is awash over his face as he knows he has solved the mystery. He truly thinks of himself as a detective and not a war criminal.

      Reply
  6. Heather says:

    It’s the preposterous politeness that he just devours his prey with that intrigues me. He is a true opportunist and makes this film viciously delightful.

    Reply
  7. says:

    Thanks for being the first commenter of my first review @ Movie Mobsters!

    Reply