7 Responses to “Review: Hereafter (2010)”

  1. Univarn says:

    On some, perhaps stubborn, level I still want to see this. Not because I’m convinced it’s going to be good, but rather that Eastwood’s never made something I thought was “that bad.” Which this year I consider to be pretty darn good. Nice Review though, definitely helps me to keep my anticipation well in check.
    Univarn recently posted..

  2. I thought Bridges of Madison County was just awful, so I’m thinking that perhaps this can’t be that bad. This year is shaping up so oddly. The movies aren’t horrible, but they’re not excellent either.
    Encore Entertainment recently posted..Flashback- Hello- Dolly!

    • Peter E. says:

      agree big time on your assessment of this year’s films. Nothing extraordinary at all (perhaps one or two films at most). Bridges was a bad film, but most everything he has done over the past decade has been quite wonderful….

  3. Red says:

    Glad I decided not to waste my money on this. I just keep reading the word “flat”. And I’m not that big of a fan of Eastwood as a director the last decade to begin with, excluding Mystic River and Iwa Jima.
    Red recently posted..

  4. Fitz says:

    I thought this was an odd decision considering Eastwood is an atheist.
    Fitz recently posted..

  5. Peter E. says:

    Oh no!!! This is terrible news. I only skimmed this because I am going to see this later today — and it is Clint so I remain very hopeful and excited. I will respectfully state that I hope you are wrong on this one….

  6. filmgurl says:

    Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this one. I think those who see this film will either really love it or hate it. It’s definitely not a film for everyone. And, I think it’s for a more sophisticated audience. It’s one of those movies I think that has meaning, a deeper meaning than what is seen on the surface. My review if anyone wants to check it out: http://ow.ly/2ZiUm Thanks! :)

« New TRUE GRIT Movie Stills